Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TkDQM: Add standalone monitoring modules for OT Rechits and new resolution plots for ITRechits #33482

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Apr 24, 2021

Conversation

sroychow
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR adds

  • Modules for OT Rechit monitoring and validation. These can be run only with a standalone config - DQM/SiTrackerPhase2/test/dqmstep_phase2tk_cfg.py. The input to the config should be a GEN-SIM-RECO file. It runs the IT and OT rechit producers together with the DQM & Validation step.
  • Fixes an axis range in OT cluster validation module.
  • For IT rechits, plots of cluster res vs cluster size(in X & Y) are added.
  • For IT rechits, a scatter plot of res Y vs res X is added

PR validation:

Validated with wf 23234.0, 34634.0.

cc @gabriel-rmrz @mmusich @tsusa @emiglior

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33482/22208

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @sroychow (Suvankar Roy Chowdhury) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/SiTrackerPhase2
Validation/SiTrackerPhase2V

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@arossi83, @sroychow this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Apr 21, 2021

@cmsbuild, please test

Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sroychow thanks a lot for this!
I left few mostly technical comments below about modernized event and ES data access.

DQM/SiTrackerPhase2/plugins/Phase2OTMonitorRecHit.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DQM/SiTrackerPhase2/test/dqmstep_phase2tk_cfg.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DQM/SiTrackerPhase2/test/dqmstep_phase2tk_cfg.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DQM/SiTrackerPhase2/test/harvestingstep_phase2tk_cfg.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
DQM/SiTrackerPhase2/plugins/Phase2OTMonitorRecHit.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dfd2d0/14373/summary.html
COMMIT: 1611ce3
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-04-20-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/33482/14373/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2877046
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 148
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2876869
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 3668.408 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 375.258 KiB TrackerPhase2ITRecHitV/EndCap_Side1
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 375.258 KiB TrackerPhase2ITRecHitV/EndCap_Side2
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 166.586 KiB TrackerPhase2ITRecHitV/Barrel
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@sroychow
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmusich thanks for your comments. Addressed the comments and updated the other modules to the recommended syntax of getting Handle and ES data.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Apr 21, 2021

Addressed the comments and updated the other modules to the recommended syntax of getting Handle and ES data.

thank you!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33482/22216

  • This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #33482 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Apr 21, 2021

@sroychow there's still a couple of clang-tidy warnings: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dfd2d0/14391/llvm-analysis/runCMSClangTidyChecks.log.
Also since you are at it can you squash the last 8 commits?

bux fix in accessing handles

simplify product access

update procduct access to recommended format

formatting fix

fix bug in reading digisimlinks

update handle access
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33482/22228

  • This PR adds an extra 56KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #33482 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Apr 21, 2021

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dfd2d0/14401/summary.html
COMMIT: c0c9c58
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-04-21-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/33482/14401/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 7 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2877046
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 148
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2876863
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 3668.408 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 375.258 KiB TrackerPhase2ITRecHitV/EndCap_Side1
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 375.258 KiB TrackerPhase2ITRecHitV/EndCap_Side2
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 166.586 KiB TrackerPhase2ITRecHitV/Barrel
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Apr 24, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 0c38ca4 into cms-sw:master Apr 24, 2021
@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

hi @sroychow @cms-sw/dqm-l2 - it looks like this PR adds a dependency on Validation to DQM/SiTrackerPhase2. Could that be fixed? Possibly by moving stuff that needs MC information to Validation. Thanks!

@sroychow
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidlange6 Thanks! should be addressed by #33557. Please have a look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants