New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NanoAOD, JMENanoAOD] Backport of #33824 (Remove jercVars variables, update puId config) to 11_2_X #33834
[NanoAOD, JMENanoAOD] Backport of #33824 (Remove jercVars variables, update puId config) to 11_2_X #33834
Conversation
…E nano. Update puId configuration for JME nano.
A new Pull Request was created by @nurfikri89 (Nurfikri Norjoharuddeen) for CMSSW_11_2_X. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/NanoAOD @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
@mariadalfonso ok. Should I close this PR? |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8b868d/15298/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+xpog backport inline with master |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Backport from #33824
PR description:
This PR aims to
With this PR, the event size for the main Nano is reduced from 2.90 kb/event to 2.86 kb/event. The comparison was made using 5K events from a TTJets RunIISummer20UL17MiniAODv2 sample. No event size changes for JMENano.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Original PR is #33824