Migrate module config in RecoTracker{IterativeTracking} to use default cfipython v2

[jeongeun]

PR description:

Optimization of the python configurations: Improve maintainability by cleaning up the duplicated and cloning from the default/reference configurations.

In this PR, 6 files changed.
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/ElectronSeeds_cff.py
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/JetCoreRegionalStep_cff.py
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/MixedTripletStep_cff.py
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/PixelLessStep_cff.py
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/PixelPairStep_cff.py
RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/TobTecStep_cff.py

This pr is originally from #33903 (now closed due to the unsuccessful rebasing in the RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/JetCoreRegionalStep_cff.py).

(The previous PRs were PR#33207, PR#33307, PR#33352, PR#33543, PR#33563, PR#33671, PR#33901)

PR validation:

Event Content comparison check was also done and there is no change with these updates.
Tested in CMSSW_12_0_X, the basic test all passed in the CMSSW PR instructions.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34007/23132

• This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/MixedTripletStep_cff.py modified in PR(s): Update MkFit to support multiple iterations #33802
  • File RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/PixelLessStep_cff.py modified in PR(s): Update MkFit to support multiple iterations #33802
  • File RecoTracker/IterativeTracking/python/TobTecStep_cff.py modified in PR(s): Update MkFit to support multiple iterations #33802

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jeongeun (JeongEun Lee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoTracker/IterativeTracking

@perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @gpetruc, @ebrondol, @mtosi, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[perrotta]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8e8aab/15741/summary.html
COMMIT: 558cfc3
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-06-07-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/34007/15741/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 7 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2648335
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2648300
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 36 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 155 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

+1

• Technical migration, as planned
• Jenkins tests pass and show no differences in outputs

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1