New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove PhysicsTools/ParallelAnalysis package #34070
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34070/23223
|
A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/ParallelAnalysis @cmsbuild, @santocch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-42aa63/15847/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Ah yes, I think we should! Thanks for spotting that. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34070/23304
|
Pull request #34070 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @santocch can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-42aa63/15952/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/core-l2 Do you have further comments? |
+1 (apologies for the delay) |
+1 |
merge |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
The PhysicsTools/ParallelAnalysis seems to be completely unmaintained, and I think it's also unused with all the new analysis methods that people use nowadays (e.g. ROOT RDataFrame, Python ecosystem..). Can it be removed to avoid maintenance burden in the future?
PR validation:
CMSSW compiles.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No backport intended.