Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ecal validation consumes #3428

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 23, 2014
Merged

Ecal validation consumes #3428

merged 2 commits into from Apr 23, 2014

Conversation

yiiyama
Copy link
Contributor

@yiiyama yiiyama commented Apr 22, 2014

Consumes migration of Ecal validation software.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @yiiyama (Yutaro Iiyama) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

Ecal validation consumes

It involves the following packages:

Validation/EcalDigis
Validation/EcalHits

@ojeda, @danduggan, @rovere, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @deguio, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@danduggan
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2014
@ktf ktf merged commit 256ad47 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_1_X Apr 23, 2014
@yiiyama yiiyama deleted the ecal-validation-consumes branch May 1, 2014 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants