Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reserve one bit for flagging individual pixels #34509

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 17, 2021

Conversation

tsusa
Copy link
Contributor

@tsusa tsusa commented Jul 15, 2021

PR description:

Change Pixel Digi Packing to reserve one bit for flagging individual pixels (needed for the foreseen PR concerning Pixel Digi Morphing).

Pixel Digi Packing was changed in #14470 to have indexes spanning the full module in case of small pixels (Phase II InnerPixel). In that PR packing was changed from (8, 9, 4, 11) -> (11, 11, 0, 10) /(row, col, time, adc) which can accommodate 2048x2048 pixels (row x column),
row = 11bits -> 2^11 = 2048, col = 11bits -> 2^11 = 2048.

With this PR the packing changes from (11, 11, 0, 10) -> (11, 10, 0, 10), reducing row x column to 2048x1024. However, this would fit all Phase II use cases (both for 25x100 μm2 and 50x50 μm2) as there are max 1354 (rows)*434 (cols) in the case of 2x2 rectangular pixel layout.

No changes are expected.

PR validation:

No failure when running runTheMatrix.py.

@emiglior, @mmusich , @veszpv

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34509/24004

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @tsusa (Tatjana Susa) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DataFormats/SiPixelDetId (simulation)
  • DataFormats/SiPixelDigi (simulation)

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @rovere, @VinInn, @OzAmram, @dkotlins, @ferencek, @tvami this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 15, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b8018f/16873/summary.html
COMMIT: 62ee660
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-07-15-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34509/16873/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2786302
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2786279
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Jul 16, 2021

enable gpu

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Jul 16, 2021

Digis and DetId affect reco as well. Why reco is not notified here?

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Jul 16, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jul 16, 2021

@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 FYI

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b8018f/16891/summary.html
COMMIT: 62ee660
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-07-15-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
Additional Tests: GPU
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34509/16891/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

GPU Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 19735
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 19729
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 3 files compared)
  • Checked 12 log files, 9 edm output root files, 4 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2786302
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2786279
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jul 16, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jul 17, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants