Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ParticleFlow linking customisation #3502

Merged

Conversation

mark-grimes
Copy link

Fixes the customisation of the particle flow linking between the extended tracker and the HF.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mark-grimes (Mark Grimes) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Fix ParticleFlow linking customisation

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration

@civanch, @nclopezo, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@bachtis, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@andersonjacob, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@mark-grimes
Copy link
Author

merge

Tests 10000, 10200, 10400, 11200, 11400, 12000, 12800, 13000, 13600 and 14600 pass all steps.
Tests 12400, 12600, 13800 and 14000 fail in step 2 with known errors.
Tests 12200, 14200 and 14400 fail in step 3 with known errors.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #3502 was updated. @civanch, @nclopezo, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @Degano can you please check and sign again.

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2014
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1b1d4fd into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC Apr 25, 2014
@mark-grimes mark-grimes deleted the fixPFLinkingCustomisation branch August 3, 2015 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants