New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CMSSW_12_0_X] Add new Run3 offline GT in autoCond and its relval workflow #35231
[CMSSW_12_0_X] Add new Run3 offline GT in autoCond and its relval workflow #35231
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for CMSSW_12_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
backport of #35202 |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelValsRelVals-INPUT |
@smuzaffar will this new RelVal input buffering, that you mentioned in #35202 (comment) , have to happen separately for each branch? |
@cmsbuild , please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelValsRelVals-INPUT |
From https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a5b48c/18508/dasqueries/run.txt It seems you should also backport #34643 |
Pull request #35231 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
Thanks! |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a5b48c/18523/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+Upgrade PRs run fine with the new 2021 cosmics workflows. |
+alca |
Hi @kskovpen @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 would you mind signing this backport as well? Thanks! |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
urgent |
Hi @tvami this can be merged in 12_0_X to allow further backports. |
+1
|
Oh I guess it would have been nice to have that PR included there. On the other hand, it's not a must, the GT can be specified from the cmsDriver... |
PR description:
Backport of #35202