Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add NanoAOD DQM to RelVal wfs #35412

Merged
merged 9 commits into from Oct 8, 2021
Merged

Conversation

kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Add Nano+DQM steps to standard 2021 RelVal workflows.

PR validation:

The updated workflows were run through runTheMatrix and tested locally.

FYI @bbilin @jmartinb @rappoccio

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35412/25522

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kskovpen for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

Please test

@@ -3504,6 +3504,15 @@ def gen2021HiMix(fragment,howMuch):
'--geometry' : geom
}

upgradeStepDict['NanoDQM'][k] = {'-s':'NANO,DQM:@nanoAODDQM',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is the rational to define the NanoDQM here ?
I do not see the miniAODDQM

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I have updated the PR accordingly.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8496ea/18914/summary.html
COMMIT: f14b686
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-24-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35412/18914/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8496ea/18914/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8496ea/18914/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2473302
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2473274
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 149 log files, 32 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35412/25531

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor Author

kskovpen commented Oct 5, 2021

Thanks, @srimanob! The prod-like wfs now have Nano step included. Are you suggesting to add DQM to these wfs, and also run Reco+MiniAOD+Nano in one step as in baseline wfs?

Hi @kskovpen Nope. I expect the prod-like workflow run RECO, Mini, Nano separately as done in McM. No DQM is needed.

Thanks - just was confused for a moment :)

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 5, 2021

@qliphy @perrotta Could you please consider including this to CMSSW_12_1_0_pre4. PR is almost ready. When the test result is out, I believe it should be ready to merge. It's technical PR to allow PdmV to run Nano and NanoDQM together with validation workflow.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the urgent label Oct 5, 2021
@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 5, 2021

Urgent

@qliphy @perrotta Could you please consider including this to CMSSW_12_1_0_pre4. PR is almost ready. When the test result is out, I believe it should be ready to merge. It's technical PR to allow PdmV to run Nano and NanoDQM together with validation workflow.

@srimanob I understood from the ORP right now that this was not really that "urgent" for pre4...
In any case, if it is validated and signed by 2300, so that it can be tested in the nightly IB, we can include it

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 5, 2021

OK, sure. No problem. I am waiting for the comparison to come. How can I remove urgent label?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8496ea/19413/summary.html
COMMIT: 63cafe0
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-05-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35412/19413/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-8496ea/34634.21_TTbar_14TeV+2026D76_ProdLike+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+MiniAOD+Nano

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2798082
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2798054
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • Checked 159 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 6, 2021

OK, sure. No problem. I am waiting for the comparison to come. How can I remove urgent label?

I have edited your comments to remove "urgent"

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 6, 2021

+Upgrade

This PR is to add NanoAOD and NanoDQM to the standard sequence, in the same step as RECO and Mini. In addition, for the prod-like workflow, Nano step is added also after MiniAOD step.

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor Author

kskovpen commented Oct 6, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 8, 2021

+1

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 9, 2021

@kskovpen This PR is causing IB issues, see #35596

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 9, 2021

Here is the fix #35597

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants