New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run3-alca205C Modernize several AlCaRecoProducers for HCAL #35499
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35499/25681
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@yuanchao, @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-854a39/19309/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Well, not really: there are jet related differences in Run2 wfs 1325.81 and 136.731: are they understood @bsunanda |
@perrotta I dont really understand how this works, if I go to the DQM bin-by-bin
|
wfs 1325.81 and 136.731 do not use any alba related to HCAL. Only 140.53 does that for hcalcalminbias. I don't think the cause of the difference is due to the changed code. It is due to different input type |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-854a39/19320/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1
|
PR description:
Modernize several AlCaRecoProducers for HCAL
PR validation:
Tested using standard runTheMatrix workflows
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special