Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-alca205C Modernize several AlCaRecoProducers for HCAL #35499

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2021

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Oct 1, 2021

PR description:

Modernize several AlCaRecoProducers for HCAL

PR validation:

Tested using standard runTheMatrix workflows

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35499/25681

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Calibration/HcalAlCaRecoProducers (alca)

@yuanchao, @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 1, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-854a39/19309/summary.html
COMMIT: 775b2ae
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-30-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35499/19309/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1006 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211080
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2568
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 62
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3208428
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 65.355 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53 ): 63.680 KiB Hcal/DigiRunHarvesting
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53 ): 1.676 KiB RPC/DCSInfo
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 1, 2021

+alca

  • no differences due to the change, only due to " workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log "

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 1, 2021

  • no differences due to the change, only due to " workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log "

Well, not really: there are jet related differences in Run2 wfs 1325.81 and 136.731: are they understood @bsunanda

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 1, 2021

@perrotta I dont really understand how this works, if I go to the DQM bin-by-bin
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-30-1100+854a39/45888/dqm-histo-comparison-summary.html
there is no changes for 1325.81 nor for 136.731

Removed, added and changed plots
-0 | +0 | 0

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Oct 1, 2021

wfs 1325.81 and 136.731 do not use any alba related to HCAL. Only 140.53 does that for hcalcalminbias. I don't think the cause of the difference is due to the changed code. It is due to different input type

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 1, 2021

please test
(let give it another try...)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-854a39/19320/summary.html
COMMIT: 775b2ae
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-30-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35499/19320/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211080
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211052
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 1, 2021

+1

  • Differences in wfs 1325.81 and 136.731 were transitories

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 73ff39f into cms-sw:master Oct 1, 2021
@bsunanda bsunanda changed the title Run3-alca205C Modernize several AlCaRecoProducers for HGCal Run3-alca205C Modernize several AlCaRecoProducers for HCAL Oct 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants