Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-TB64 Make some simple changes to the classes in SimG4CMS/HcalTestBeam #36506

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 16, 2021

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Make some simple changes to the classes in SimG4CMS/HcalTestBeam

PR validation:

Use test workflows in SimG4CMS/HcalTestBeam/test area

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36506/27387

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36506/27389

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • SimG4CMS/HcalTestBeam (simulation)

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@cvuosalo, @rovere, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: Build ClangBuild
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f69387/21293/summary.html
COMMIT: 2615fab
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2021-12-15-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36506/21293/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Build

I found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page.

Clang Build

I found compilation warning while trying to compile with clang. Command used:

USER_CUDA_FLAGS='--expt-relaxed-constexpr' USER_CXXFLAGS='-Wno-register -fsyntax-only' scram build -k -j 128 COMPILER='llvm compile'

See details on the summary page.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36506/27390

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #36506 was updated. @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f69387/21294/summary.html
COMMIT: d698d25
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2021-12-15-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36506/21294/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 42
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3250719
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3250697
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 41 files compared)
  • Checked 177 log files, 37 edm output root files, 42 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Dec 16, 2021

+1

because it is tests I would agree to have both Verbatim and #ifdef, in other places I am not sure.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Simple code changes that do not affect the final outputs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants