New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop type specs in RecoHI, RecoJets and RecoMET #36510
Drop type specs in RecoHI, RecoJets and RecoMET #36510
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36510/27392
|
A new Pull Request was created by @NiharSaha (Nihar Ranjan Saha) for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c568ca/21302/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
||
trkMuonTrackVMuonAssocHI = MTVhi.clone( | ||
associatormap = 'tpToTkMuonAssociationHI', | ||
label = ['cutsRecoTrkMuons'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure why [] was used here in the original version of the file instead of ( ) like below and the original class:
label = cms.VInputTag(cms.InputTag("globalMuons")), |
It probably has no effect at all but we could uniform it now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have edited from [] to () in the new commit. Thank you.
) | ||
glbMuonTrackVMuonAssocHI = MTVhi.clone( | ||
associatormap = 'tpToGlbMuonAssociationHI', | ||
label = ['globalMuons'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment as previous
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36510/27435
|
Pull request #36510 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36510/27595
|
Pull request #36510 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36510/27596
|
Pull request #36510 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c568ca/21507/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Drop type specs in Validation/RecoHI, Validation/RecoJets and Validation/RecoMET python configuration files.
Central DQM migration campaign for drop type spces following
https://cms-sw.github.io/cms_coding_rules.html#6--packaging-rules-1
and update the safer syntax for existing parameters like: (1) drop type specifications where the original parameter exists. (2) using "clone" instead of "deepcopy" (3) move all parameters inside the clone
PR validation:
Tested in CMSSW_12_3_X via runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos