Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Safer syntax for modifying the configuration parameters in g4SimHits_cfi.py #36524

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 17, 2021

Conversation

perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

In #36506 some partial migration to a safer syntax for modifying the configuration parameters in g4SimHits_cfi.py was started, which avoids overwriting types of those parameters or mis-naming them.

In order not to let the work half done, here are the remaining updates for the other non-migrated parameter updates in the same config

PR validation:

The short matrix runs without error.
Unless I made some trivial mistake in it, no changes are expected anywhere in the test outputs.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36524/27413

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta (Andrea Perrotta) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • SimG4Core/Application (simulation)

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @cvuosalo, @rovere, @bsunanda, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

Why do you change TimeSliceUnit = 0.00 shouldn't it be TimeSliceUnit = 0.001

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Why do you change TimeSliceUnit = 0.00 shouldn't it be TimeSliceUnit = 0.001

Thank you Sunanda: this is exactly what I meant for "trivial mistake" in the PR description...

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

please abort

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36524/27415

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #36524 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Dec 17, 2021

@perrotta , thanks, I was not sure that you are on-line, so make extra PR - it will be closed.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2021
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36524/27466

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

  • There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #36524 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Dec 17, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit bcdf7b6 into cms-sw:master Dec 17, 2021
@perrotta perrotta deleted the updateG4SimHitsCfi branch December 17, 2021 21:58
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-277c1c/21373/summary.html
COMMIT: 45ef8d9
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2021-12-17-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36524/21373/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 14125 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 42
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3250719
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 17241
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3233456
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 41 files compared)
  • Checked 177 log files, 37 edm output root files, 42 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 5 / 41 workflows

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants