New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change to SiStripCluster
DataFormat: use auto
for return types
#36852
Change to SiStripCluster
DataFormat: use auto
for return types
#36852
Conversation
test parameters:
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36852/28080
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
527187e
to
ea74ac5
Compare
SiStripCluster
DataFormat: use auto for return typesSiStripCluster
DataFormat: use auto
for return types
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36852/28081
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Previous discussions are in #36669 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-589d69/22128/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+reconstruction |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
resolves #36336
resolves #35489
PR description:
Follow up on #35489, based on suggestion at #36336 (comment).
SiStripCluster
DF, useauto
for return types;PR validation:
cmssw
compiles.