Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change to SiStripCluster DataFormat: use auto for return types #36852

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 2, 2022

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Feb 1, 2022

resolves #36336
resolves #35489

PR description:

Follow up on #35489, based on suggestion at #36336 (comment).

  • 527187e : Change to SiStripCluster DF, use auto for return types;

PR validation:

cmssw compiles.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Feb 1, 2022

test parameters:

  • enable_test = threading
  • workflows = 11834.21,11834.13

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2022

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36852/28080

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@mmusich mmusich force-pushed the bufferOverFlowRechitsSortedInPhi branch from 527187e to ea74ac5 Compare February 1, 2022 16:00
@mmusich mmusich changed the title Change to SiStripCluster DataFormat: use auto for return types Change to SiStripCluster DataFormat: use auto for return types Feb 1, 2022
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36852/28081

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DataFormats/SiStripCluster (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echabert, @swertz, @pieterdavid, @robervalwalsh, @rovere, @VinInn, @alesaggio, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Feb 1, 2022

@cmsbuild please test with #36819

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Feb 1, 2022

Previous discussions are in #36669

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-589d69/22128/summary.html
COMMIT: ea74ac5
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2022-02-01-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
Additional Tests: THREADING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/36852/22128/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-589d69/11834.13_TTbar_14TeV+2021PU_mlpf+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+DigiPU+RecoNanoPU+HARVESTNanoPU
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-589d69/11834.21_TTbar_14TeV+2021PU_ProdLike+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+DigiPU+RecoNanoPU+MiniAODPU+NanoPU

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 43
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3449612
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 27
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3449562
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 42 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 181 log files, 42 edm output root files, 43 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 2, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Feb 2, 2022

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Segfaults in workflow 11834.21 step 2 buffer overflow in RecHitsSortedInPhi on NaN
4 participants