New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RepeatingCachedRootSource now supports Refs #36864
RepeatingCachedRootSource now supports Refs #36864
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36864/28119
|
please test |
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages:
@makortel, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
std::optional<std::tuple<WrapperBase const*, unsigned int>> | ||
RepeatingCachedRootSource::RCProductGetter::getThinnedProduct(ProductID const&, unsigned int key) const { | ||
return {}; | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do these imply that RepeatingCachedRootSource
does not support thinned products?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct. As that feature isn't used in production and is most likely not being used in the 'wild' I didn't feel it was worth the effort to try to get to work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tend to agree. How about adding a comment somewhere here that this feature is intentionally omitted for now, and can be added later if there is use for it? (to avoid the need to wonder in the future if the case was that or if there was some fundamental reason)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
Added the necessary infrastructure to support Ref like classes when doing a delayed read from RepeatingCachedRootSource. Extended the unit test to read and check Refs.
b1a3423
to
3c09a67
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36864/28123
|
Pull request #36864 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fdde03/22168/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
PR validation:
Code compiles and framework unit tests pass.