Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix era to be compliant with underlying D91 geometry #36931

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 13, 2022

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Feb 11, 2022

PR description:

Addresses comment at #36660 (comment), in order to comply with the description of the geometry at:

("O9","T30","C17","M10","F6","I15") : "D91",

PR validation:

none

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

N/A

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36931/28265

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36931/28266

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #36931 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @jordan-martins, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @wajidalikhan, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @bbilin can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Feb 11, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflow = 40634.0

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Feb 11, 2022

@cmsbuild, please test

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

type bug-fix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10ed27/22351/summary.html
COMMIT: 2ae9367
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2022-02-10-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36931/22351/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10ed27/22351/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10ed27/22351/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-10ed27/40634.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D91+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 46
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3764395
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3764371
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 45 files compared)
  • Checked 193 log files, 42 edm output root files, 46 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

PR to fix the era of D91, and add missing doc.

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

+pdmv

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/geometry-l2 is there anything that prevents you signing this bug fix?

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants