New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improved Payload Inspector plots for DropBoxMetaData
#36934
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36934/28269
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @ggovi, @tvami, @malbouis, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-895bda/22356/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Inspired by PR #36927, I propose few miscellaneous improvements:
PR validation:
Run the script in the test folder
CondCore/PhysicsToolsPlugins/test/test_DropBoxMetadata_PayloadInspector.sh
and got the following plots:if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A
attn: @tlampen