Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

introduce alignment campaign-like unit test for pede #37211

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 14, 2022

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Mar 11, 2022

PR description:

As discussed here cms-sw/cmsdist#7660 (comment) introduce a pede execution based off a real (small-scale) MC alignment campaign (cosmics-only). The needed input files to steer the execution are at: /store/group/alca_global/tkal_millepede_tests/

PR validation:

run scram b runtests_testPedeCampaign, but at the moment (for reason that are being investigated) the pede execution gets stuck (starting from CMSSW_12_3_0_pre3 onwards), while it run fine in previous pre-releases (The issue, due to a wrong commit for the pede spec file in cmsdist has been solved in cms-sw/cmsdist#7685)

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

A backport exists, to show the infrastructure is working.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Mar 11, 2022

@consuegs @antoniovagnerini @tsusa FYI

@mmusich mmusich changed the title introduce alignment campaing-like unit test for pede introduce alignment campaign-like unit test for pede Mar 11, 2022
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37211/28813

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Alignment/MillePedeAlignmentAlgorithm (alca)

@cmsbuild, @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @adewit, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Mar 11, 2022

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a8f699/23048/summary.html
COMMIT: 4055172
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2022-03-11-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37211/23048/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test testPedeCampaign had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695161
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3695131
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Mar 11, 2022

test parameters:

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Mar 11, 2022

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a8f699/23053/summary.html
COMMIT: 4055172
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-11-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37211/23053/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a8f699/23053/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a8f699/23053/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695153
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3695081
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 13, 2022

Since cms-sw/cmsdist#7685 is merged, should the status of this be changed to "ready for review"?

@mmusich mmusich marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2022 19:30
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37211/28826

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #37211 was updated. @cmsbuild, @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Mar 13, 2022

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a8f699/23077/summary.html
COMMIT: d0c2a12
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-13-0000/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37211/23077/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695161
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3695125
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Mar 14, 2022

@cms-sw/alca-l2 any further thoughts?

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 14, 2022

+alca

  • new unit test passed

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Unit test succeeds

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ce4f5b2 into cms-sw:master Mar 14, 2022
@mmusich mmusich deleted the addMillePedeTestingSetup branch March 14, 2022 17:06
@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Mar 15, 2022

@mmusich There seems to be a related IB unit issue after merging this PR. Would you please have a look?

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/logreader/slc7_amd64_gcc10/CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-14-2300/unitTestLogs/Alignment/TrackerAlignment#/292-292

Processing allMillePede.C...

---> test test_PixelBaryCentreTool had ERRORS
TestTime:3600
^^^^ End Test test_PixelBaryCentreTool ^^^^

Tests for package Alignment/TrackerAlignment ran.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Mar 15, 2022

@qliphy

There seems to be a related IB unit issue after merging this PR. Would you please have a look?

No. This PR has been merged in CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-14-2300 according to https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/html/cmssdt-ib/#/ib/CMSSW_12_4_X, and I see that this test has been failing since earlier (e.g. CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-14-1100)

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/logreader/rhel8_amd64_gcc10/CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-14-1100/unitTestLogs/Alignment/TrackerAlignment#/6

therefore I conclude that the failure is unrelated.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Mar 15, 2022

Actually it failed even earlier: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/logreader/rhel8_amd64_gcc10/CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-12-1100/unitTestLogs/Alignment/TrackerAlignment#/3 (CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-12-1100) so it's clearly not related.

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Mar 15, 2022

Ok, thanks @mmusich The new IB [CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-15-1100] so far looks good. We will then merge the backported PRs later soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants