Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change quality criteria for some supercrystals in the Ecal Endcaps for LED Quality plots [Master] #37378

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 30, 2022

Conversation

abhih1
Copy link
Contributor

@abhih1 abhih1 commented Mar 28, 2022

PR description:

This PR is done to modify the quality criteria of a few Supercrystals/Towers in DQM LED quality plots of the ECAL Endcaps. This set of supercrystals are known to be problematic by the ECAL LED experts and are being monitored. However it does not affect the quality of physics data and so in order to avoid the DQM displaying them as BAD constantly the quality criteria for them are being changed. The list of supercrystals tower ids are stored in the data file SClist.dat

PR validation:

This PR was validated by running the Standard Ecal calibration workflow on a test run and observing the DQM output file on an offline DQM test gui to confirm the code changes work as expected. The plots were also approved by the ECAL LED expert.
The PR was also validated by running the DQM relval workflow 136.874 using the runTheMatrix script
runTheMatrix.py -l 136.874 --ibeos

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37378/29031

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @abhih1 (Abhirami Harilal) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/EcalMonitorClient (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rchatter, @simonepigazzini, @thomreis, @argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test with cms-data/DQM-EcalMonitorClient#2

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6731e3/23485/summary.html
COMMIT: d9f03c2
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-28-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37378/23485/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6731e3/23485/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6731e3/23485/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3583670
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 20149
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 333
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3563166
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -1328.2459999999992 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 1461.475 KiB HLT/JME
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 1.887 KiB HLT/Filters
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 39434.0,... ): -2527.102 KiB HGCAL/HGCalValidator
  • Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test with cms-data/DQM-EcalMonitorClient#2
Retriggering the tests to get a clean comparison

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6731e3/23516/summary.html
COMMIT: d9f03c2
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-29-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37378/23516/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3585896
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3585860
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Backport tested in Online DQM at P5

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 04bb4f6 into cms-sw:master Mar 30, 2022
@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

ping bot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants