New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed overlaps in M10 Phase2 Scenario (D86, D88, D91) #37431
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37431/29124
|
A new Pull Request was created by @slomeo (Sergio Lo Meo) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-41b0a3/23597/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Comparison differences in the D88 workflows are expected since the geometry has slightly changed. |
+1 |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Fixed all the overlaps in the Muon Yoke for M10 Phase2 Scenario (D86, D88, D91)
FYI: @srimanob
PR validation:
validation by "nohup cmsRun SimG4Core/PrintGeomInfo/test/python/g4OverlapCheck2026_cfg.py >& overlaps.out &"
I set tolerance equal to 0.00001 to find nm overlaps.
Muon's volumes are not present in the overlaps.out file.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
nothing special