-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Backport 12_3_X] Update to DNN-based strategy for outside-in seed generation in Muon HLT #37467
[Backport 12_3_X] Update to DNN-based strategy for outside-in seed generation in Muon HLT #37467
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @kondratyevd (Dmitry Kondratyev) for CMSSW_12_3_X. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
urgent Requested for HLT development in |
please test The PR tests are not sensitive to this PR, see #37437 (comment). |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a821c2/23662/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Just a reminder that we also need cms-data/RecoMuon-TrackerSeedGenerator#4 for this update. So once it is merged we need a PR to update the version number of the relevant package in this file: https://github.com/cms-sw/cmsdist/blob/IB/CMSSW_12_3_X/master/data/cmsswdata.txt For that we first need to know if the memory consumption reported in these profiles is acceptable: #37437 (comment) |
I can't really judge this myself right away. This might be worth discussing in a TSG meeting to get better feedback (cc: @silviodonato). Or what is it already discussed in TSG? If I look at the % values, this looks like a non-negligible increase, although it is a few percent of the total (<5%). At the same time, this looks like a very large increase compared to the previous model (x10 - x20 ?), if I understood correctly:
Was this increase expected? By the way, should the model be reviewed by a ML contact, to see if there are ways to improve it? I don't think this necessarily stops this PR from proceeding, but these questions should be addressed before this is actually integrated in the HLT menu. |
test parameters: |
cmsdist PR to get the new data files is cms-sw/cmsdist#7755 |
please test |
@missirol yes, the size increase is understood, it is simply due to the increased number of weights in the network. I suppose, we can re-optimize the network for a given limitation on the size of the model, if needed. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a821c2/23689/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 would you agree signing this PR, verbatim backport of #37437 ? |
+reconstruction |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This is a backport for #37437.
The backport is needed to integrate the OI seeding upgrade into the V2 HLT menu.
There are no changes to the code w.r.t. original PR.
@missirol