New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding pre-selection to input (AK4) jets for tau RECO #3762
Conversation
In these files manual intervention and rewriting ak5 to ak4 was necessary RecoTauTag/Configuration/python/RecoPFTauTag_cff.py RecoTauTag/RecoTau/python/PFRecoTauChargedHadronProducer_cfi.py RecoTauTag/RecoTau/python/RecoTauCombinatoricProducer_cfi.py RecoTauTag/RecoTau/python/RecoTauJetRegionProducer_cfi.py RecoTauTag/RecoTau/python/RecoTauPiZeroProducer_cfi.py RecoTauTag/RecoTau/python/RecoTauShrinkingConeProducer_cfi.py
Conflicts merged in RecoTauTag/RecoTau/python/RecoTauCombinatoricProducer_cfi.py
Conflicts: RecoTauTag/RecoTau/python/RecoTauShrinkingConeProducer_cfi.py
A new Pull Request was created by @jpavel (Pavel Jez) for CMSSW_7_1_X. Adding pre-selection to input (AK4) jets for tau RECO It involves the following packages: RecoTauTag/Configuration @nclopezo, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
-1 ---> test runtestTqafTopTools had ERRORS you can see the results of the tests here: |
-1 ---> test runtestPhysicsToolsPatAlgos had ERRORS you can see the results of the tests here: |
Hi, it seems to me that the test failures are not the fault of this PR:
or
seem to be caused by lack of product in the input file. Perhaps some IO rules should be added to read ak5* collection in case the ak4 is not available. |
Reco -- Adding pre-selection to input (AK4) jets for tau RECO
This PR is replacement of #3594 by including changes on top of #3631
It adds the possibility to reject some jets as an input seeds for tau reconstruction based on their pt and eta. It is turned on by default and the requirements for running the tau RECO sequence are
The performance change is expected - loss of efficiency for very low pt true taus, and also decreased fake rate for very low pt jets.
However, no change is expected for the taus passing recommended kinematical cuts (pt > 20 GeV + |eta| < 2.3).
This is shown on slides: https://indico.cern.ch/event/316898/material/0/0.pdf
Additionally, one can expect improvement of overall timing needed for tauRECO (as the algorithm is executed fewer times) and also size reduction in the RECO PFTauCollection, as it will contain fewer candidates.
PR's #3558 and #3594 are being closed as they have been rendered moot by the #3631
@veelken and @monicava, this is something you wanted to watch as well