New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12_3_X] simple RECO squence for SPLASH runs #37623
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @pmandrik for CMSSW_12_3_X. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @qliphy, @rvenditti, @micsucmed, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
please test |
Pull request #37623 was updated. @perrotta, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @qliphy, @rvenditti, @micsucmed, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-71b732/24038/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_4_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged. |
Uhm, I did not realize that this PR was not in the master. |
backport of #37624 |
PR description:
For the beam SPLASH runs simplification of RECO sequence is proposed in order to speed up event processing in Event Display DQM clients. As simplified sequence is needed only for SPLASH runs, not for regular 'cosmic' and 'beam operation', the customization in visualizationProcessing function is applied when beamSplashRun option is True.
PR validation:
Tested locally, to be tested at P5 in production using on-going runs.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
backport of #37624
for ongoing operation at P5