New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12.4.X] protect ALCARECOSiStripCalCosmicsNano
for missing tracks (when Tracker DCS is OFF)
#38214
[12.4.X] protect ALCARECOSiStripCalCosmicsNano
for missing tracks (when Tracker DCS is OFF)
#38214
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
type trk, bug-fix |
ALCARECOSiStripCalCosmicsNano
for missing tracks (when Tracker DCS is OFF)ALCARECOSiStripCalCosmicsNano
for missing tracks (when Tracker DCS is OFF)
test parameters:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8067d9/25227/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #38213
PR description:
Title says it all.
The problem arises because the input events for
SiStripCalCosmics
(which is the input for this workflow)cmssw/Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers/python/ALCARECOSiStripCalCosmicsNano_cff.py
Line 18 in cb55e64
are DSC-filtered:
cmssw/Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers/python/ALCARECOSiStripCalCosmics_cff.py
Lines 13 to 19 in cb55e64
but the
SiStripCalCosmicsNano
is not, hence in circulating beams situation (when TK HV is off) there are no input tracks, but the producer is run nonetheless.Resolves problem described at https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/failure-at-tier0-of-sistripcalcosmicsnano/11186.
PR validation:
Private.
After the fix, successfully run the following command:
python3 Configuration/DataProcessing/test/RunPromptReco.py --scenario cosmicsEra_Run3 --reco --global-tag 123X_dataRun3_Prompt_v8 --lfn=root://eoscms.cern.ch//eos/cms/tier0/store/data/Run2022A/Cosmics/RAW/v1/000/352/705/00000/636e0528-de8a-4acd-bd7c-e99bf0c4aa27.root --alcareco SiStripCalCosmicsNano
using the problematic input file specified in the cmsTalk posting
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
backport of #38213