New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12_4_X] Put sampic subdet id behind the era modifier #38365
[12_4_X] Put sampic subdet id behind the era modifier #38365
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
backport of #38338 |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
type ctpps |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a78335/25507/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
Pull request #38365 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
With the current commits I see this error (log here):
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT AddOn Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testExpressPPSAlCaRecoProducer had ERRORS ---> test testPromptPPSAlCaRecoProducer had ERRORS ---> test testExpressPPSAlCaRecoOutput had ERRORS ---> test testPromptPPSAlCaRecoOutput had ERRORS and more ... RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ... |
Pull request #38365 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
There is a failure in reading one of the files, |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
+alca
|
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (but tests are reportedly failing) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
merge |
PR description:
Backport of #38338 and #38366
This PR puts the totemTimingDetId subdetector behind the era modifier. For Run3 subdet=5, for 2016,2017,2018 subdet=6
PR validation:
PR was tested with 136.8562 which was previously failing.
Backport:
Backport of #38338 and #38366
FYI @ChrisMisan