New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Run3 ALCA Express/Prompt workflow #38681
Conversation
thanks @tocheng I think it would be useful to backport this to 12_4_X too, the pp data taking is happening with that, so the wf-s being tested here would make sense there |
assign alca |
type new-feature |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38681/30969
|
New categories assigned: alca @yuanchao,@francescobrivio,@malbouis,@tvami,@ChrisMisan you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
A new Pull Request was created by @tocheng (Tongguang) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @tvami, @ChrisMisan, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ | |||
workflows[1000] = [ '',['RunMinBias2011A','TIER0','SKIMD','HARVESTDfst2','ALCASPLIT']] | |||
workflows[1001] = [ '',['RunMinBias2011A','TIER0EXP','ALCAEXP','ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCALRUN1','ALCAHARVD1','ALCAHARVD2','ALCAHARVD3','ALCAHARVD4','ALCAHARVD5','ALCAHARVD7','ALCAHARVD8']] | |||
workflows[1001.2] = [ '',['RunZeroBias2017F','TIER0EXPRUN2','ALCAEXPRUN2','ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCAL','ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCALLA','ALCAHARVD4','ALCAHARVDSIPIXELALIHG']] | |||
workflows[1001.3] = [ '',['RunSingleMuon2022A','TIER0EXPRUN3','ALCAEXPRUN3','ALCAHARVDEXPRUN3']] | |||
workflows[1002.3] = [ '',['RunZeroBias2022B','TIER0PROMPTRUN3','ALCAEXPRUN3','ALCAHARVDEXPRUN3']] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is the "Prompt" configuration re-running the ALCAEXPRUN3
block? Shouldn't it rather run the run-3 equivalent of ALCASPLIT
?
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
file opening error in 136.858 |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38681/31146
|
Pull request #38681 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @tvami, @ChrisMisan, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-228118/26333/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+alca |
+Upgrade |
+pdmv |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Add one Express-like and one Prompt-like ALCA workflows covering ALCRECO, ALCAPROMPT to Harvestor using Run-3 data.
2022A SingleMu data is used for Express like workflow(2022B SingleMu data seems have problem accessing through xrootd)
2022B ZeroBias data is used for Prompt like (MinimumBias data has zero events in 2022B Collision runs so far, so use ZeroBias instead)
PR validation:
The two workflows are tested by runTheMatrix
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport