Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace Geometry_cff with GeometryDB_cff in RecoBTag/RecoBTau #38787

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 20, 2022

Conversation

jeongeun
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:
Review on the Reco part of #31113

process.load("Configuration.StandardSequences.Geometry_cff")
was outdated #8810
It should be replaced with
process.load("Configuration.StandardSequences.GeometryDB_cff")

In this PR, RecoBTag (RecoBTau) configuration files 1 file (2 files) are fixed.

modified:   RecoBTag/SoftLepton/test/testMuonAssociator.py
modified:   RecoBTau/JetTagComputer/test/testGenericMVAJetTagComputer_cfg.py
modified:   RecoBTau/JetTagComputer/test/testJetTagProducer_cfg.py

PR validation:

Tested in CMSSW_12_5_X, the basic test all passed in the CMSSW PR instructions

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38787/31140

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jeongeun (JeongEun Lee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoBTag/SoftLepton (reconstruction)
  • RecoBTau/JetTagComputer (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@JyothsnaKomaragiri, @emilbols, @demuller, @andrzejnovak, @AlexDeMoor this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-040269/26338/summary.html
COMMIT: 11f5ab1
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-19-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38787/26338/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3662417
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3662381
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

Dear @cms-sw/tau-pog-l2 , it seems to me the config files fixed by this PR aren't updated since a long time (some of them form 2013).
Do you know if we still need it, maybe used in some unit-test, or we can remove them? Thanks

@alebihan
Copy link

Hi, this package is not used by the tau-POG (anymore ?), contains "tau" for historical reasons. BTV should probably confirm what should be done.

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, this package is not used by the tau-POG (anymore ?), contains "tau" for historical reasons. BTV should probably confirm what should be done.

@cms-sw/btv-pog-l2 could you please confirm whether these test files are still needed?

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/btv-pog-l2 could you please confirm whether these test files are still needed?

a kind ping to @cms-sw/btv-pog-l2

@johnalison
Copy link
Contributor

@emilbols, @demuller, @andrzejnovak, @AlexDeMoor can you comment on the tests from the BTV side ?

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 24, 2022

kind ping BTV folks @emilbols, @demuller, @andrzejnovak, @AlexDeMoor @cms-sw/btv-pog-l2

@smuzaffar smuzaffar modified the milestones: CMSSW_12_5_X, CMSSW_12_6_X Aug 28, 2022
@AlexDeMoor
Copy link
Contributor

After reviewing this code, it appears to be old code unrelated to what we do or use now. We no longer use them and agree with their removal.

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

After reviewing this code, it appears to be old code unrelated to what we do or use now. We no longer use them and agree with their removal.

Hi @AlexDeMoor , thanks for the update. @jeongeun , could you please remove the files?

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

A kindly ping to @jeongeun

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38787/32153

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #38787 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please check and sign again.

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-040269/27647/summary.html
COMMIT: 94c75f0
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-09-18-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38787/27647/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 1 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3621956
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3621929
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction

  • removing outdated files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants