New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GEM Timing Plots #38818
GEM Timing Plots #38818
Conversation
…ged 1-2 rather than 0-1
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38818/31192
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
57a5282
to
51ce54c
Compare
I fixed the code. Will this label have it reevaluated? |
72ef39f
to
96ab713
Compare
…ged 1-2 rather than 0-1
96ab713
to
5f71c8a
Compare
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38818/31251
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38818/31255
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
c91f555
to
1a8d691
Compare
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38818/31258
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
A new Pull Request was created by @nickh2000 for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
type gem |
type feature |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-45f387/26497/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nickh2000 Please have a check and fix on the issue #38940
//Added plots 07-21-22 *** | ||
gemVFATBXPerChamber[chamber - 1][hist_index][layer]->Fill(Hit->BX(), vfat); | ||
//indexed plots by BX 07-21-22 | ||
gemChamberVFATBX[hist_index][Hit->BX() + 3]->Fill(chamber_bin(1, 1, chamber), vfat); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems "Hit->BX() + 3" can be as large as "7" and exceeds the boundary, which then cause the issue as reported in #38940
Hi @qliphy , this is very strange indeed. EMTF DAQ readout window is [-3,+3] which should never return 7 for this. Maybe this protection should be added to the EMTF unpacker rather than the DQM plots. |
ok, I found the problem. During LS2 there were some issues with corrupted GEM TPs which apparently sometimes extend to invalid BX values (4 in this case). I'll add a protection to the unpacker about this soon. This should fix this crash as well |
PR description:
This PR creates two GEM timing plots:
gemVFATBXPerChamber - plots hits by VFAT and BX, each plot indexed by different chambers and layers
gemChamberVFATBX - plots hits by VFAT and Chamber, each plot indexed by different BX's (-3 to 3)
PR validation:
Validated with
runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos.