New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clamp the number of pixel tracks to the capacity of the SoA [12.4.x] #38884
Clamp the number of pixel tracks to the capacity of the SoA [12.4.x] #38884
Conversation
type bugfix |
backport #38883 |
enable gpu |
A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-51580b/26509/summary.html GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
hold |
Pull request has been put on hold by @qliphy |
unhold |
please test |
f3c7494
to
d04920f
Compare
please test |
Pull request #38884 was updated. @jpata, @clacaputo can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-51580b/26542/summary.html GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction |
urgent |
unhold |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
The data structure used to store the pixel tracks currently has a fixed size of 32768, which was found to be adequate based on MC studies.
While running over collisions data a small fraction of events has been found to have a larger number of tracks, leading to assertion failures or memory access errors.
This PR clamps the number of pixel tracks to the capacity of the SoA, and adds a warning like
PR validation:
Running over an event with > 33k pixel tracks no longer causes assertion failures.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR.
Backport of #38883 for data taking.