Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the handling of module labels unsafe for DQM #38966

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 5, 2022

Conversation

fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

@fwyzard fwyzard commented Aug 4, 2022

Follow up to #38963.

Replace the unsafe characters in-place to avoid make unnecessary copies of the labels.

Use the safe label for the name of the DQM histograms, but keep the original label for their titles.

Replace the unsafe characters in-place to avoid make unnecessary copies
of the labels.

Use the safe label for the name of the DQM histograms, but keep the
original label for their titles.
@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Aug 4, 2022

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38966/31420

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • HLTrigger/Timer (hlt)

@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @silviodonato this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@gartung
Copy link
Member

gartung commented Aug 4, 2022

enable profiling

@gartung
Copy link
Member

gartung commented Aug 4, 2022

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0070ac/26643/summary.html
COMMIT: aad8b57
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-04-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
Additional Tests: PROFILING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38966/26643/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0070ac/26643/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0070ac/26643/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3691510
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3691486
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Aug 4, 2022

Just for my education: where can one check the performance change of FastTimerService in the Profiling tests (or elsewhere)?

@gartung
Copy link
Member

gartung commented Aug 4, 2022

@gartung
Copy link
Member

gartung commented Aug 4, 2022

The files seems to be missing even though the logs indicate that the job ran without throwing any exceptions.

@gartung
Copy link
Member

gartung commented Aug 4, 2022

It may take a file for the web server to register that the files are present. I can see them when I log directly into the web server host.

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Aug 5, 2022

Thanks for the info, @gartung !

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Aug 5, 2022

+hlt

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 5, 2022

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants