New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attempt to remove LTO compilation warning #39118
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39118/31659
|
A new Pull Request was created by @civanch (Vladimir Ivantchenko) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
please test for CMSSW_12_5_LTO_X lets test it for LTO build too |
Thanks, @civanch for this. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21154b/26936/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21154b/26937/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Thanks @civanch |
@srimanob , no the dqm failure in #39118 (comment) are due to comparing LTO relvals with non-LTO baseline |
+Upgrade Technical PR. Thanks @smuzaffar |
+1 |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39118/31709
|
Pull request #39118 was updated. @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
please test for CMSSW_12_5_LTO_X |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21154b/26985/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21154b/26986/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+Upgrade Re-sign. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Attempt to fix #38684 if will work, other SIM LTO warnings will be fixed in the same way.
PR validation:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for: no