[L1T] Phase-2, include missing collections in outputs

[cecilecaillol]

PR description:

This PR addresses the missing Tk object collections in the CMSSW_12_5_0_pre5 RelVals. It includes fixes were needed to avoid errors after adding in the objects to the EventContent. One error that came up in the FEVTDEBUGHLToutput_step was: The class "l1t::TkJetWord" is compiled and for its data member "tkJetWord_" we do not have a dictionary for the collection "bitset<70>". Because of this, we will not be able to read or write this data member.
classes_def.xml was adjusted to avoid the error. Local PR: cms-l1t-offline#1048

This PR also adds missing collections for Phase 2 tau-jet-met to the event content. Specifically the 9x9 Sums for histogrammed jets, the NN Puppi taus, and the HPS taus. Local PR: cms-l1t-offline#1047

We need this PR to be backported to 12_5 for our Phase-2 L1 MC production

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39401/32105

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39401/32105/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl -k https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39401/32105/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39401/32107

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @cecilecaillol for master.

It involves the following packages:

• DataFormats/L1Trigger (l1)
• L1Trigger/Configuration (l1)

@epalencia, @cmsbuild, @cecilecaillol, @rekovic can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@kreczko, @rovere, @eyigitba, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @thomreis, @dinyar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cecilecaillol]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39401/32109

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #39401 was updated. @epalencia, @cmsbuild, @cecilecaillol, @rekovic can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39401/32361

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #39401 was updated. @rekovic, @epalencia, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @cecilecaillol can you please check and sign again.

[cecilecaillol]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bcf915/27926/summary.html
COMMIT: 3c4146e
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-02-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39401/27926/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-bcf915/41834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D94+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
• Reco comparison results: 1 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3432650
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3432625
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 204 log files, 49 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[cecilecaillol]

+l1

[cecilecaillol]

@cmsbuild please test

Retrigger the test as it was almost 2 weeks ago. @cecilecaillol could you please provide information as asked by @missirol in #39401 (comment)

Addressed in last commit

[srimanob]

+upgrade

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1

[perrotta]

@cecilecaillol @BenjaminRS please add to the PR description for reference an estimate of the increase of the event size, as I already asked for the backport PR in #39451 (comment)