Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12.5.X] do not drop pixel duplicates for phase-2 IT reconstruction #39443

Merged

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Sep 19, 2022

PR description:

Poor man solution to #39007.
PR #37559 has created a serious deterioration of the phase-2 track reconstruction (see https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/new-validation-campaign-12-5-0-pre5-phase2-d88-added/14722/15), likely due to pixels being killed in the middle of the cluster when a PU simHit comes to overlap with a signal simHit.
This PR introduces a DropDuplicates parameters in PixelThresholdClusterizer.cc and turns that off for all phase-2 reconstruction.
Same mechanism was introduced (only for the heterogeneous version of the reconstruction) at #38761, that would have to be rebased if this PR is merged.

PR validation:

cmssw compiles, see tests at the master version of this PR: #39407 (comment)

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

backport of #39407, needed for 12_5_0 in light of dedicated Phase-2 production to happen there.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 19, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_5_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoLocalTracker/SiPixelClusterizer (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mtosi, @VourMa, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @OzAmram, @missirol, @dkotlins, @ferencek, @gpetruc, @mmusich, @threus, @tvami this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Sep 19, 2022

@cmsbuild, please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 19, 2022

urgent

  • "needed for 12_5_0 in light of dedicated Phase-2 production to happen there."

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f4c72c/27646/summary.html
COMMIT: 5c6490c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-09-18-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39443/27646/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2224 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3699454
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 45625
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 14
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3653793
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #39407

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit aa0302e into cms-sw:CMSSW_12_5_X Sep 21, 2022
@mmusich mmusich deleted the doNotDropDuplicatesPhase2_12_5_X branch September 21, 2022 08:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants