New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add option to cut H<a+bE+cE*E #39762
Add option to cut H<a+bE+cE*E #39762
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39762/32624
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39762/32625
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bennettgberg for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-93e654/28351/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+hlt
@bennettgberg , what is the ETA of this update to the HLT menu (cc: @silviodonato)? If it is for 2022 data-taking, this PR will need to be backported to |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
It should be in full operation for 2023 data taking, but we may want to test at the end of 2022 so I will make the backport PR. Thank you! |
+1 |
PR description:
Adds an option to change the H/E cut to take the form H<a+bE+cE^2 for constants a, b, c.
This will be needed for Egamma objects in upcoming changes to the Scouting trigger.
Default behavior stays unchanged.
In particular, slide 10 shows the physics motivation--large increase in low-pT scouting electron signal reconstruction efficiency resulting from changing this cut.
PR validation:
Tested with scram b code-checks and scram b code-format. Further tests performed locally showing expected behavior of the code changes--namely, when doAnd is set to true with non-zero values for cut and cutOverE specified, all resulting scouting electrons in the collection obey H < cutOverE*E + cut and the number of these electrons is reasonable.