HLT release validation and offline DQM for EXO Run 3 HLT paths (12_5_X)

[jalimena]

PR description:

This PR is a backport of #39799

This PR:

1. removes the offline DQM monitoring of two obsolete HLT paths, which are no longer in the 2022 menu: HLT_TrkMu16_DoubleTrkMu6NoFiltersNoVtx_v and HLT_TrkMu17_DoubleTrkMu8NoFiltersNoVtx_v
2. make it not required to have all paths be valid in the numerator and denominator, for the paths monitored in MuonMonitor_cff

The reason for the second part is because in the HLT 2022 v1.3 menu, one of the paths in the denominator was removed. As a result, the DQM plots did not get made, although they would have been fine, physics-wise. Changing this flag to false is the easiest way to have similar DQM plots with the earlier and later HLT menus, and it fixes this bug.

As a result of this PR, some DQM plots will be removed, and some will reappear.

PR validation:

Using the 11634.0 ttbar workflow, I have tested that the correct histograms are produced and filled in the harvested DQM file.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Backport of #39799 . A backport to 12_4_X is necessary, and this backport is to make the intermediate release cycle 12_5_X consistent.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jalimena (Juliette Alimena) for CMSSW_12_5_X.

It involves the following packages:

• DQMOffline/Trigger (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mtosi, @Fedespring, @missirol, @HuguesBrun, @jhgoh, @trocino, @cericeci, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Update & bug fix for offline DQM for EXO & HIG Run 3 muon paths #39799

[perrotta]

backport of #39799

[perrotta]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e8db76/28520/summary.html
COMMIT: 4d4e96d
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-10-25-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39856/28520/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3697216
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 139
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3697055
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 8784.918 KiB( 50 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 971.459 KiB HLT/EXO
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 969.768 KiB HLT/EXO
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 139.001 ): 1023.392 KiB HLT/EXO
• Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

+1

• The PR was approved by DQM and merged in master, and also approved by DQM in its 12_4_X backport: I assume that this 12_5_X version of the sames was just forgotten, and I bypass the DQM signature for it

[perrotta]

merge

[emanueleusai]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged.