New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates on GE21 online/offlineDQM plots with division on modules #39985
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39985/32912
|
A new Pull Request was created by @quark2 for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @clacaputo, @mandrenguyen, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @mdhildreth, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2e8c71/28802/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1
|
you can proceed with the backports if you need this online |
+1 |
As for #39489 , this PR touches data format and can't be integrated into a closed release such as 124X and 125X |
@clacaputo thank you for the reminder. We (DQM) can deploy off-release PRs to our online systems. So if the authors want to see the new plots in online DQM we need backports to 12_4 (for online pp collisions) and 12_5 (for HI collisions). This makes is easy for us to merge the PRs with the official releases (only!) in our P5 machines, test the backports and properly keep tabs on the PRs installed. |
Hi, @emanueleusai, You mean, if the backport PRs to 124X and 125X are fine, then they could be deployed to P5 without merge, right? |
@quark2 from the point of view of DQM, yes we can do that |
+reconstruction |
@cmsbuild please test Just re-trigger the test after a week. |
+Upgrade From upgrade related package, the update on header files and classes_def are minimal. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2e8c71/29251/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
Hello, |
PR description:
This PR provides massive updates on GE21 onlineDQM/offlineDQM plots. This work is focusing on the division of GE21 information by modules (M1-M4). It is necessary because of the electronic configuration of GE21 chambers.
It is also included that the module information is propagated to the GEM unpacker in a better way, which is done by @yeckang.
PR validation:
Tests are done with
cmsRun $CMSSW_RELEASE_BASE/src/DQM/Integration/python/clients/gem_dqm_sourceclient-live_cfg.py unitTest=True runNumber=361054 dataset=/ExpressPhysics/Run2022F-Express-v1/FEVT
andrunTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos
since it makes effects on P5 and reconstruction@jshlee @watson-ij @seungjin-yang @yeckang