New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ECAL Timing Reco: CrossCorrelation algorithm update #40262
Conversation
Correct era for Run3
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40262/33313
|
A new Pull Request was created by @nminafra (Nicola Minafra) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
type ecal |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4c8e91/29521/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
enable profiling |
Removing unused variables
true, thanks! |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40262/33692
|
Pull request #40262 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4c8e91/29963/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4c8e91/29963/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction re-sign |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This PR introduces:
A proposed test script is available here:
https://github.com/nminafra/cmssw/blob/ecalTimingCC_12_6_0_pre4/RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers/test/testEcalUncalibRechitProducerWithCC_cfg.py
Profiling of the CC (this PR) and Ratio (default) are available here:
https://nminafra.web.cern.ch/cgi-bin/igprof-navigator/igreport_cc_Nov2022/20
https://nminafra.web.cern.ch/cgi-bin/igprof-navigator/igreport_ratio_Nov2022/20
CC has to run twice: once with OOT correction for better timing, a second time without OOT corrections for better spike rejection (see presentation above). Even running twice, CC is faster than Ratio.
@thomreis @jking79