New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor SiPixel Charge Reweighting code #40349
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40349/33438 ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
b497aa2
to
75bf0e8
Compare
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40349/33439 ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
75bf0e8
to
84b0601
Compare
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40349/33442
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
84b0601
to
3922cea
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40349/33443
|
Nice, differences in MsgLogger only (as expected) |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
type trk |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4ce99d/29683/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
hi @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 @cms-sw/simulation-l2 @cms-sw/orp-l2 is there a chance we could merge this before the winter break? In the end it's a very technical PR that doesnt change the physics output, but I'd need it for a follow-up PR |
+1 updates are technical mostly |
+Upgrade Technical PR, change is not expected. Failure in comparison does not come from this PR. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
For now this should lead to no changes.
PR validation:
Tested a Phase-1 and a Phase-2 wf:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport and no backport is needed