New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TrackingRecHitSoA Classes Clean Up #40575
TrackingRecHitSoA Classes Clean Up #40575
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40575/33820
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40575/33821
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee (Adriano Di Florio) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
please test |
@AdrianoDee I have mixed feelings about these changes:
|
I see your point here, let me restore it. |
please abort |
f490f8f
to
df3c5f8
Compare
ah as we have multiple archs for LTO builds that is why bot was confused which one to use. I will update the configuration to use amd64 arch as default . For now I have triggered the tests by explicitly telling bot to use el8_amd64_gcc11 |
I see, thanks @smuzaffar. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-79f142/30124/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
there is nothing which works out of the box but I can force re-build the comparison job to use LTO baseline. I will start it now |
please test for CMSSW_13_0_LTO_X/el8_amd64_gcc11 lets rerun with latest LTO IB |
please test for CMSSW_13_0_X/el8_amd64_gcc11 lets test it for default/production IB too |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-79f142/30333/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-79f142/30338/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction |
+heterogeneous |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Prompted by #40465 (comment) fixes the issue. Took the chance to do a minor cleanup of the
TrackingRecHitSoA*
classes.Technical PR. No change expected.