Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MultiTrackValidator: add efficiency and fakerate vs deltaR #4239

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jun 17, 2014

Conversation

cerati
Copy link
Contributor

@cerati cerati commented Jun 13, 2014

MultiTrackValidator: add efficiency and fakerate vs deltaR to closest track

@cerati
Copy link
Contributor Author

cerati commented Jun 13, 2014

@arizzi finally we have added it to the MTV so that we can better monitor the new iteration

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @cerati for CMSSW_7_2_X.

MultiTrackValidator: add efficiency and fakerate vs deltaR

It involves the following packages:

Validation/RecoTrack

@ojeda, @danduggan, @rovere, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @deguio, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@arizzi
Copy link
Contributor

arizzi commented Jun 16, 2014

@cerati is it also binned in jet pT ?

@cerati
Copy link
Contributor Author

cerati commented Jun 16, 2014

ciao @arizzi, no we wanted to use track-only quantities for now. given the strong correlation with jet properties we think it is ok.

@arizzi
Copy link
Contributor

arizzi commented Jun 16, 2014

well, the efficiency loss is visible only in high pt-jet so I'm not sure it
is a good choice.

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:55 AM, cerati notifications@github.com wrote:

ciao @arizzi https://github.com/arizzi, no we wanted to use track-only
quantities for now. given the strong correlation with jet properties we
think it is ok.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4239 (comment).

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Jun 17, 2014

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine).

ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2014
MultiTrackValidator: add efficiency and fakerate vs deltaR
@ktf ktf merged commit 41e6c7d into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_2_X Jun 17, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants