Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small Shashlik reco speed improvement #4924

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 13, 2014

Conversation

mark-grimes
Copy link

@davidlange6 is this what you meant?

Functionally the same but the order of checks has been changed to improve speed. There is a minor side effect in that fewer debug printouts will occur when the previously-second "if" evaluates to false, so that the previously-first "if" (which would produce the printout) is skipped.
All plots are ttbar at 140 pileup in Shashlik; "before" plots include #4909.

Total event times before and after
shashlikrecotimer-afterlangesuggestion-eventtotal
This equates to a drop from 6.1+/-1.7 minutes to 5.9+/-1.8 minutes per event (mean+/-sqrt(variance)). Doesn't sound that impressive when stated like that, but they're the same events not random data.

User time by module before
shashlikrecotimer-beforelangesuggestion

User time by module after
shashlikrecotimer-afterlangesuggestion

Some modules appear to slightly increase in time (e.g. particleFlowTmp, particleFlowEGamma) but others significantly decrease (particleFlowBlock). I'm not sure how accurate the timing is so I suspect this is just noise.

Updated igprof file at /afs/cern.ch/user/g/grimes/public/SLHC16_patch1Preview/igreport_perf_ShashlikRecoAfterLangeSuggestion_15evt.res
@davidlange6, @lgray

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mark-grimes (Mark Grimes) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Small Shashlik reco speed improvement

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools

@nclopezo, @cmsbuild, @Degano, @StoyanStoynev, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @bachtis, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@fratnikov, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@mark-grimes
Copy link
Author

merge

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2014
Small Shashlik reco speed improvement
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 5b1ad52 into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC Aug 13, 2014
@mark-grimes mark-grimes deleted the implementLangeSpeedup branch January 23, 2015 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants