Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Beamspot nominal collision2015 #5463

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Sep 28, 2014
Merged

Beamspot nominal collision2015 #5463

merged 3 commits into from Sep 28, 2014

Conversation

franzoni
Copy link

  • introduce beamspot parameters as agreed during PPD General discussion https://indico.cern.ch/event/341218/ , NominalCollision2015
  • the defaualt beamspot (e.g. as used by ConfigBuilder if no option is specified) remains as before : Realistic8TeVCollision
  • use the NominalCollision2015 for postLs1 relvals (explicit cmsDriver.py option added)

Giovanni Franzoni added 2 commits September 22, 2014 11:01
introduce NominalCollision2015 beamspot scenario, according to: https…
8b9acf7 
…://indico.cern.ch/event/341218/
beamspot of postLs1 relvals set to NominalCollision2015; run1 relvals…
4a605e1 
… left as they were, making it explicit Realistic8TeVCollision (note: Realistic8TeVCollision is still the cmsDriver default)
@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_2_X milestone Sep 22, 2014
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @franzoni (Giovanni Franzoni) for CMSSW_7_2_X.

Beamspot nominal collision2015

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences
IOMC/EventVertexGenerators

@civanch, @nclopezo, @vlimant, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @cerati, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@franzoni
Copy link
Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 4a605e1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5463/1050/summary.html

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Sep 27, 2014

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo can you please take care of it?

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2014
@davidlange6
Merge pull request #5463 from franzoni/beamspot_NominalCollision2015-…
edf623e 
…CMSSW_7_2_X_2014-09-22-0200

Beamspot nominal collision2015
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit edf623e into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_2_X Sep 28, 2014
@cmsbuild cmsbuild mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2014
Merged
ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2014
@ktf
Merge pull request #5677 from ktf/more-forward-port
7d48067 
Forward port #5463 into CMSSW_7_3_X
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
comparison-available fully-signed operations-approved orp-pending simulation-approved tests-approved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Next CMSSW_7_2_X
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@franzoni @cmsbuild @civanch @davidlange6