Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

increase splitting for PU samples; using GEN-SIM from 720_pre6 #5469

Conversation

fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

@fabozzi fabozzi commented Sep 22, 2014

increase splitting in gen2015(...) for pileup samples
using GEN-SIM from 720_pre6 in baseDataSetRelease

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @fabozzi for CMSSW_7_2_X.

increase splitting for PU samples; using GEN-SIM from 720_pre6

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @franzoni, @nclopezo, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@franzoni
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @nclopezo can you please take care of it?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo can you please take care of it?

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2014
…0_updatesFor72X

increase splitting for PU samples; using GEN-SIM from 720_pre6
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit e8af5c4 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_2_X Sep 23, 2014
@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

@fabozzi - belated question - what is the motivation here? It seems we are creating jobs that last only 5 minutes - this makes for rather inefficient operations (true even if later increased by a factor of 6 as discussed in the PPD meeting)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants