switch pileup to 35 for relvals

[franzoni]

switch pileup to 35 for relvals, both 25ns and 50sn; as agreed here: https://indico.cern.ch/event/342011/

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @franzoni (Giovanni Franzoni) for CMSSW_7_3_X.

switch pileup to 35 for relvals

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @franzoni, @nclopezo, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[franzoni]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: 858db28
I ran the usual tests and I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test testDataFormatsFWLite had ERRORS

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5591/85/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes (but tests are reportedly failing). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5591/85/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes (but tests are reportedly failing). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

[franzoni]

Hello, I suspect that the test failing with testDataFormatsFWLite does not originate from this PR. The local tests I run on top of CMSSW_7_3_X_2014-09-26-0800 did not show that error. Did the issue relarted to testDataFormatsFWLite arise in relation to any other PR ? If so, could the tests be re-triggered, please ?
Cheers, G.

[franzoni]

Any news on this PR ?

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 858db28
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5591/212/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5591/212/summary.html

[franzoni]

cool, thanks for this.
Impact on the IB turn-around time ?
12 workflows should now take a factor up-to-six longer to complete the DIGI-RECO step. That should be a ~negligible amount of extra time, when the full matrix is run for IB.
Cheers, G.

[ktf]

I do not see any particularly big difference.