EXO Val Dev backported to 72X

[perrotta]

The idea is to backport #5320 (originally from @ndaci, and merged in 73X since two weeks already) in 72X.
This PR would allow monitoring also in 72X a set of paths from Exotica included in the Run2 HLT menu.
Of course, I let @deguio and the release managers to decide about it. But I think it would be a pity not being able of monitoring those HLT paths in 72X, when the PR exists in 73X and it is now ready also for 72X.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta for CMSSW_7_2_X.

EXO Val Dev backported to 72X

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/Exotica

@nclopezo, @danduggan, @rovere, @cmsbuild, @deguio, @ojeda can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

+1
I don't see a problem. we can discuss at the ORP today.
ciao,
F.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @nclopezo can you please take care of it?

[davidlange6]

why is this a pointer (that is then leaked, it seems)
std::map<unsigned int, int> * countobjects = new std::map<unsigned int, int>;

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #5715 was updated. @nclopezo, @danduggan, @rovere, @cmsbuild, @deguio, @ojeda can you please check and sign again.

[perrotta]

Yes. @davidlange6: I agree with you that there would have been a leakage in the parts of code you pointed out. Let me notice that such a leakage was already there in the version of the file currently in the release, before this PR.
With the last commit I provide a possible fix for it. If @ndaci agrees with it, it can also be forward ported to 73X.

[ndaci]

Many thanks for providing the fix!!
Yes I agree, please keep this fix in both 72X and 73X :)

Great!
Nadir

2014-10-07 12:28 GMT+02:00 perrotta notifications@github.com:

Yes. @davidlange6 https://github.com/davidlange6: I agree with you that
there would have been a leakage in the parts of code you pointed out. Let
me notice that such a leakage was already there in the version of the file
currently in the release, before this PR.
With the last commit I provide a possible fix for it. If @ndaci
https://github.com/ndaci agrees with it, it can also be forward ported
to 73X.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5715 (comment).

[deguio]

+1
thanks for fixing this,
F.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @nclopezo can you please take care of it?