Changes for root 5.34.22

[ktf]

Complete list of checksum / IORules changes as required by the new
version of root. This is the squashing of all the commits we had on the
CMSSW_7_3_DEVEL_X branch.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ktf (Giulio Eulisse) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Changes for root 5.34.22

It involves the following packages:

AnalysisDataFormats/EWK
AnalysisDataFormats/TopObjects
DataFormats/Alignment
DataFormats/BTauReco
DataFormats/CLHEP
DataFormats/CSCRecHit
DataFormats/CaloTowers
DataFormats/Candidate
DataFormats/CastorReco
DataFormats/Common
DataFormats/DTRecHit
DataFormats/EcalDetId
DataFormats/EcalDigi
DataFormats/EgammaCandidates
DataFormats/EgammaReco
DataFormats/FEDRawData
DataFormats/FWLite
DataFormats/GEMRecHit
DataFormats/GeometryVector
DataFormats/GsfTrackReco
DataFormats/HLTReco
DataFormats/HcalCalibObjects
DataFormats/HcalDetId
DataFormats/HcalIsolatedTrack
DataFormats/HcalRecHit
DataFormats/HepMCCandidate
DataFormats/JetReco
DataFormats/L1CSCTrackFinder
DataFormats/L1DTTrackFinder
DataFormats/L1GlobalCaloTrigger
DataFormats/L1GlobalMuonTrigger
DataFormats/L1GlobalTrigger
DataFormats/L1Trigger
DataFormats/LTCDigi
DataFormats/Luminosity
DataFormats/METReco
DataFormats/MuonDetId
DataFormats/MuonReco
DataFormats/ParticleFlowCandidate
DataFormats/ParticleFlowReco
DataFormats/PatCandidates
DataFormats/Provenance
DataFormats/RPCRecHit
DataFormats/RecoCandidate
DataFormats/Scalers
DataFormats/SiPixelRawData
DataFormats/SiStripCommon
DataFormats/SiStripDetId
DataFormats/SiStripDigi
DataFormats/TauReco
DataFormats/TestObjects
DataFormats/TrackReco
DataFormats/TrackerRecHit2D
DataFormats/TrackingRecHit
DataFormats/V0Candidate
SimDataFormats/GeneratorProducts
SimDataFormats/JetMatching
SimDataFormats/Track
SimDataFormats/Vertex

The following packages do not have a category, yet:

DataFormats/GEMRecHit

@covarell, @cerminar, @Martin-Grunewald, @diguida, @rcastello, @bendavid, @perrotta, @civanch, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @ktf, @vciulli, @Dr15Jones, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @mommsen, @vadler, @mmusich, @mulhearn, @nclopezo, @emeschi, @thuer, @monttj, @StoyanStoynev can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @jpavel, @argiro, @threus, @venturia, @mmarionncern, @imarches, @ahinzmann, @acaudron, @lgray, @ferencek, @trocino, @Sam-Harper, @wmtan, @VinInn, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @amagitte, @abbiendi, @battibass, @wddgit, @makortel, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: dc39f02
I found an error when building:

>> Compiling capabilities tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc491/src/DataFormats/RPCRecHit/src/DataFormatsRPCRecHit/a/seal_cap.cc 
>> Compiling LCG dictionary: tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc491/src/DataFormats/HcalIsolatedTrack/src/DataFormatsHcalIsolatedTrack/a/xr.cc
>> Building capability library tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc491/src/DataFormats/MuonDetId/src/DataFormatsMuonDetId/libDataFormatsMuonDetIdCapabilities.so
>> Checking EDM Class Version for src/DataFormats/MuonDetId/src/classes_def.xml in libDataFormatsMuonDetIdCapabilities.so
Automatic building of dictionaries now off
error: class 'edm::EventID' has a different checksum for ClassVersion 12. Increment ClassVersion to 13 and assign it to checksum 341254076
error: class 'edm::FileIndex::Element' has a different checksum for ClassVersion 12. Increment ClassVersion to 13 and assign it to checksum 1881476699
error: class 'edm::IndexIntoFile::RunOrLumiEntry' has a different checksum for ClassVersion 11. Increment ClassVersion to 12 and assign it to checksum 447201247
gmake: **\* [tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc491/src/DataFormats/Provenance/src/DataFormatsProvenance/libDataFormatsProvenanceCapabilities.so] Error 1
>> Compiling capabilities tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc491/src/DataFormats/GEMRecHit/src/DataFormatsGEMRecHit/a/seal_cap.cc 
>> Compiling capabilities tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc491/src/DataFormats/V0Candidate/src/DataFormatsV0Candidate/a/seal_cap.cc 


you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6590/1164/summary.html

[ktf]

Ok, looks like the only way to test this is to do the full thing. Merging and updating root.