Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed all code related to running EventProcessor asynchronously #707

Merged

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

The asynchronous interface was previously only used online. This is no longer needed and would not play well with the up coming threaded framework.

The asynchronous interface was previously only used online. This is no longer needed and would not play well with the up coming threaded framework.
@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nclopezo David, please run the usual checks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 4, 2013

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for CMSSW_7_0_X.

Removed all code related to running EventProcessor asynchronously

It involves the following packages:

FWCore/Framework

@Dr15Jones, @ktf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

@nclopezo
Copy link
Contributor

nclopezo commented Sep 4, 2013

Hi,

I ran the tests for this pull request on top of CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-09-04-0200 all tests passed:

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE=slc5_amd64_gcc472/379/consoleFull

you can see the artifacts here:

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/379/

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

nclopezo added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2013
Removed all code related to running EventProcessor asynchronously
@nclopezo nclopezo merged commit 529019b into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_0_X Sep 4, 2013
@mkirsano mkirsano mentioned this pull request May 16, 2014
@mkirsano mkirsano mentioned this pull request May 28, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants