Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fastsim: 75X: use same tau DQM plot harvester as FullSim #8799

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 23, 2015
Merged

Fastsim: 75X: use same tau DQM plot harvester as FullSim #8799

merged 2 commits into from Apr 23, 2015

Conversation

lveldere
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @lveldere for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Fastsim: 75X: use same tau DQM plot harvester as FullSim

It involves the following packages:

Validation/Configuration

@civanch, @nclopezo, @cvuosalo, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @deguio, @slava77, @danduggan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@lveldere
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants