Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hcal noise filters backport #8805

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 23, 2015

Conversation

igv4321
Copy link
Contributor

@igv4321 igv4321 commented Apr 21, 2015

Backporting PR #8685

Compared to PR #8685, there is a minor difference in the config files -- the "HBHENoiseFilterResultRun2Loose" flag is made default only for 25 ns Run 2 rather than for the whole Run 2. For 50 ns Run 2 we still use "HBHENoiseFilterResultRun1".

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @igv4321 for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Hcal noise filters backport

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/RecoAlgos
DataFormats/METReco
RecoMET/METProducers
SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration

@civanch, @nclopezo, @cvuosalo, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @ahinzmann, @abbiendi, @mmarionncern, @jhgoh, @Martin-Grunewald, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @TaiSakuma this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 21, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ def customisePostLS1(process):
# 25ns specific customisation
if hasattr(process,'digitisation_step'):
process = customise_Digi_25ns(process)
if hasattr(process,'dqmoffline_step'):
process = customise_DQM_25ns(process)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why not do the same in 75X?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, will eventually do the same in 75X. The proper Run 2 config wasn't obvious when the implementation was originally discussed.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8805/4308/summary.html

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants