SimDataFormats/Vertex: clean unused pattern-based selection rules

[davidlt]

The following two types:

• edm::Ref<std::vector<SimVertex>,*>
• edm::RefVector<std::vector<SimVertex>,*>

are unused by ROOT6, but ROOT5 manages to selected classes with them.

The actual types selected are:

• edm::SimVertexRef
• edm::SimVertexRefVector

which are already listed in classes.h file.

The patch will bring back the missing types to ROOT6 dictionary and
change is ROOT5 compatible.

The difference in ROOT6 dictionary after modification:

--- seal_cap.cc.orig    2015-06-08 14:51:16.992555582 +0200
+++ tmp/slc6_amd64_gcc491/src/SimDataFormats/Vertex/src/SimDataFormatsVertex/a/seal_cap.cc      2015-06-08 14:53:26.006608002 +0200
@@ -3,8 +3,12 @@
  "LCGReflex/vector<SimVertex>",
  "LCGReflex/CoreSimVertex",
  "LCGReflex/SimVertex",
+ "LCGReflex/edm::Ref<std::vector<SimVertex>,SimVertex,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<SimVertex>,SimVertex> >",
+ "LCGReflex/edm::Ref<vector<SimVertex>,SimVertex,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<vector<SimVertex>,SimVertex> >",
  "LCGReflex/std::vector<const SimVertex*>",
  "LCGReflex/vector<const SimVertex*>",
+ "LCGReflex/edm::RefVector<std::vector<SimVertex>,SimVertex,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<std::vector<SimVertex>,SimVertex> >",
+ "LCGReflex/edm::RefVector<vector<SimVertex>,SimVertex,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<vector<SimVertex>,SimVertex> >",
  "LCGReflex/edm::RefProd<std::vector<SimVertex> >",
  "LCGReflex/edm::RefProd<vector<SimVertex> >",
  "LCGReflex/edm::Wrapper<std::vector<SimVertex> >",

Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov David.Abdurachmanov@cern.ch

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlt for CMSSW_7_5_X.

SimDataFormats/Vertex: clean unused pattern-based selection rules

It involves the following packages:

SimDataFormats/Vertex

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: c874a53
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9497/10106/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
9a9f988
d78a36b
ab71347
4ef6d59
1d937ec
8fde817
ff163e2
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9497/10106/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9497/10106/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9497/10106/summary.html